"I queried the Howard technique to Guy regarding the Rise & Fall, about not stating that the the written technique did not include, 'Down on One', then start to Rise E/O 1. He replied that it's like this Old Boy, all professionals know that, so it saves characters, which saves paper. The swing down is carried through one, and not commenced at the E/O of one."

The swing down really comes from the last step of whatever precedes - either a full figure, a prep step, or (most challengingly but informatively) a start from a simple standing position. Simple geometry tells us that the body will be lowest when the legs are divided on the way to the first step.

Unless counteracted by extreme absorbtion in the knees (as one modern school now does) there will be a slight, unwritten body rise back up from this lowest position as the body approaches the receiving foot. As (or in the view of many leading experts, just before) the feet pass the actual official rise commences - specifically foot rise for the forward partner. The overall effect is a very smooth path - a descent from the previous figure that gradually levels out and then becomes a rise that begins as a gentle floating up on the way into the foot and continues more steeply out of it.

It's important to realize that in the era when the books were written, the amount of travel achieved was, by modern standard, downright tiny. A lot of things such the as the implicit body rise and fall that happens if we divide or reclose the legs without compensating becomes obvious when you scale up to modern standards, but were just not very visible or apparent at the smaller scale, and so aren't included in the written technique - see for example how the apparent plateau of rise in the written description of a feather contrasts with what naturally and appropriately happens when the figure is danced in a flowing way.

But perhaps because of the small movements envisioned, the technique does reflect the mechanics of sending the body forward with the moving foot - something dancing ideally shares with normal walking. When we scale up to modern competitive proportion we have two choices - we can project the body weight with the moving foot, in which case the old descriptions of technique are accurate in what they address but substantially short of the full story, or we can let the body hang back and place the moving foot on its own, in which case we need an entirely new technique book.

"A lot of things such the as the implicit body rise and fall that happens if we divide or reclose the legs without compensating becomes obvious when you scale up to modern standards, but were just not very visible or apparent at the smaller scale, and so aren't included in the written technique"

As they are implicit and we have no control over them then there is no point mentioning them in the technique, but they were discussed at quite some length by Henry Jacques in his 571 page tome, "Modern Ballroom Dancing" which shows rise and fall in graphical form. Not sure of the publishing date, somewhere between 1937 & 1944.

"they are implicit and we have no control over them then there is no point mentioning them in he technique, but they were discussed at quite ome length by Henry Jacques in his 571 page ome, "Modern Ballroom Dancing" which shows rise and fall in graphical form."

I continue to be impressed by how many ultimate truths were recognized by one author or another of that era.

But I would disagree that we have no control over the implicit rises, as we can and must compensate them where they are counterproductive. Consider how terribly bouncy viennese reverse turns are if much of the height gained from closing/crossing the legs is not absorbed.

You land too quick? So you hear the tempo differently than your dance partner? Right? If that is the case you are the leader, and you lead the dance the way you hear it. The follower should be following her lead, enjoying the music, but NOT dictating to her leader what he should hear.

I teach social dancing to beginners in Orlando. This may be my philosophy, and not others but it works well for me and my students.

Jo

Count the music as 1&2&3& ,make sure you are moving the body at one continuous speed through al the halve & whole beats. The beginning of the beat is a foot position the end(&) of the beat is a body position (weight of body over standing foot).

Hi ,

I am almost convinced, that based on your way of asking about fall(lowering)on 3 problem, you probably count waltz : 1,2,3 and know that you have to step on 1, to step on 2 and to rise , to close on 3 and to lower(fall). And your partner as probably more advanced dancer knows or just dance little more technical aspects.

I can suggest to start count music :(&)1&2&3&... and to clearly understand what you do on each half beat of music.
I will not explain what to do on 1&2& as it could take to much space here.
Your problem mostly connected with 3rd music count(beat), lets divide it on 3 and &.
On 2& you stand on ball of the foot , knee little compressed free leg is apart, as it was just pushing you during the 2nd step. So starting position is clear. On 3 you should use all your possible rises (foot rise, knee rise and body rise together to the highest possible position so you fill your body is straitening). This will close your free leg to standing leg on which you rise, you should keep your free leg ball of the foot in slight contact with the floor to resist to closing action of the rise in order to control timing. On (&) transfer your full body weight on closing foot(ball of the foot)ans with no hesitation low. Lowering action will be just muscle relaxation and will start new swing action of next step. Also, when lowering try to do it in vertical line, especially before stepping back. You have to keep your heel off the floor, to lower on the ball of the foot and just when you push yourself backwards, to roll standing foot from ball to hill. This happens when 1 strikes.

I also suggest not to look at technique books, people wrote them for professionals who clear understand principles of movement, they just described (not explained) reactions (and not actions).
The best way, of course, is to go to good female professional teacher and to take pro-am lesson (when she dances with you), so you will fill what to do and when.