Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad
starting out
Posted by Chrissie
12/1/2004  6:30:00 PM
what is the best age for starting to dance?
Re: starting out
Posted by tangoteen
12/1/2004  6:38:00 PM
It all depends on the person and what what goals they want to reach. If you want to become a world class dancer, then the younger you start the better. If you want to become a national champion, then you still want to start pretty young. For instance, I want to be a national champion one day in smooth, and I started right after I turned thirteen. But if you just want to dance socially for fun, or compete locally, then I guess it doesn't really matter. Like I said it's all about what you want to accomplish and how quick you learn. Hope I helped and good luck.
Re: starting out
Posted by Anonymous
12/1/2004  10:26:00 PM
The trend towards really young ballroom competitors is a recent thing, and not one that I'm sure is going to be permanent. There's a bit of a fascination with athletisicim at present, but it will probably fade in favor of more mature mastery once the community starts to realize how hollow it often is.
Re: starting out
Posted by Laura
12/2/2004  12:11:00 AM
Interesting point you raise here, Anonymous, and I'd love to hear more of your opinions on it. You say that the trend towards really young ballroom competitors is recent (I agree with that, I've seen it really get going in the past 10 years), and not one that you are sure is going to be permanent. It's this last statement that I'm curious about: why do you think the trend toward younger competitors isn't going to be permanent?

One of my fears with competitive ballroom is that it will swing so far toward the youngsters that the adults and especially the over-35's will be completely marginalized. It's nice to hear someone say that they don't see the trend toward the younger set being permanent.

So...please expound! I'm curious about this! Thanks.
Re: starting out
Posted by owendancer
12/2/2004  8:31:00 AM
I am in agreement Laura because if the "younger" folks dont get involved then the "older" folks will become complacent and not progress. There simply must be a constant infusion of younger dancers or the sport wont proliferate. Owen
Re: starting out
Posted by Laura
12/2/2004  11:46:00 AM
Owen, I wasn't arguing that the skewing of the sport toward the younger and younger competitor was a great thing -- I was arguing the opposite point that the skewing of the sport toward the younger and younger is NOT a good thing because at some point the older people will simply not want to be involved anymore. I think it would be a shame if ballroom goes the way of figure skating where a woman is considered too old and washed up in her early 20's.

Anonymous, are you actually seeing signs that the open category is evening out again in terms of distribution of ages? Or are you just hoping to see it?

+ View More Messages

Copyright  ©  1997-2026 BallroomDancers.com