Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad
Mambo
Posted by filmcon
3/17/2005  1:58:00 PM
I'm new to the site. I don't see any mention of the Mambo. Why?

Conrad
Re: Mambo
Posted by mambo dancer
3/17/2005  5:14:00 PM
Yeah, I've noticed that too. Bolero is also missing from the Rhythm section of the "Learning the Dances" page. The admin of the site has mentioned a future enhancement in which members will have access to video clips of the entire syllabus. Maybe we'll get to see F.J. and Catherine demonstrate the basics of these dances shortly.
Re: Mambo
Posted by filmcon
3/17/2005  6:00:00 PM
I guess with the name "mambo dancer," you would have noticed that! Thanks for responding. I also noticed that the Rumba on the site's instruction has the left foot going forward to begin whereas I learned that the left foot goes to the left, replace right, left forward. The left foot forward is like the Mambo. No?
Re: Mambo
Posted by Administrator
3/17/2005  7:01:00 PM
I also noticed that the Rumba on the site's instruction has the left foot going forward to begin whereas I learned that the left foot goes to the left, replace right, left forward.


I think you mean LF side, close RF to LF, then LF forward.

You'll notice that it's actually the same step, but with a different starting point. A box is a box, whether you begin with the forward step or the side step. Apparently, the Fred Astaire studio invented this alternate version of the box in the early days to avoid copyright issues with Arthur Murray. Or so I'm told.

To dance the box step starting with the side step (QQS) rather than the forward step (SQQ) is simply a matter of preference. Typically, people tend to do whichever version they learned first. I've noticed that the QQS rhythm fits more neatly into a written syllabus. But from a musicality standpoint, SQQ is better suited to the bass line and percussion of most Rumba music.

I taught for Arthur Murrays for about 4 years, then for an ex-Fred Astaire studio for 5 more. So I've had sufficient experience with both ways of dancing the box. When I went independent I ultimately went with what I believe is the more musical of the two methods, SQQ. Sometimes I still begin with the side step, but to stay true to the music, I'll begin on count 3. That is what I recommend to anyone who has the choice (ie unencumbered by chain studio mentality and syllabus restrictions).

Regards,
Jonathan Atkinson

+ View More Messages

Copyright  ©  1997-2026 BallroomDancers.com