I just found this recursive rule in the NDCA rule book (p. 33 of http://www.ndca.org/information/rules/rules_pdfs/Rulebook_Master.pdf)
Here's an extract (irrelavent part edited out):
4. Amateur or Adult.
a. Adult A. Competitors who are 19 years of age or older.
b. Adult B. Competitors who are 35 years of age or older.
5. A couple's age classification eligibility is defined as the age of the older partner on the day of the competition for ... Adult “A” classifications, while it is defined as the age of the younger partner for Adult “B” ...
Now, if one partner is 18 and another is 36, it is not clear which category they belong to. If you put them in adult A, then the age of the older partner is the one that counts, so they really should be in adult B. But if they are adult B, then the age of the younger partner is the one that counts, so they should be in adult A.
What gives?