"If I owned a studio I would have printed and framed and hung on the wall instructions on the difference between the rise and fall in the Waltz and the Foxtrot."
There would be some merit in that, but it's not really complete, especially if read casually.
Most teachers choose to handle the incompleteness in person.
If instead you wanted to put it all on the wall, you'd probably have to do things like paint a series of pictures. This would immediately show some things the book leaves out, such as the way that the body does not reach its peak altitude until the end of step two in foxtrot, even though the foot rise that is to be used is completed during step one just as the book says.
"I think from the above it would convey right from the beginning to those interested, that in ballroom dancing there is more going on than just walking to music."
Indeed, but there's also a lot more than is immediately apparent from the book. In some cases - and this has been a good example - obsessively clinging to the book can get in the way of using live resources to fully understand dancing.
Sometimes you have to learn to dance it first, and only then go back and make sense of how the book chose to present that idea.