Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad

+ View Older Messages

Re: Lead and follow
Posted by pivotingfool
9/12/2009  7:20:00 AM
Jerry,

The others here are getting a bit ahead of me.

My experience tells me that just about everytime there is a difference in timing, the person who is moving first, is ahead of the music.

It is far easier to follow the music, than it is to dance slightly ahead of it.

If you are behind the music, you can easily catch up to the beat. However, if you are slightly ahead of the music, you have nothing to guide you. (I often see these dancers try to catch up to the next measure.)

The ladies at the Senior Center might be a little hard of hearing, or they might just be nervous. (As with a small child, excitement often causes people to move faster than they should.)

I would suggest that you try rocking side to side to the music before you start your figures. (Wispering the count might help too.) Try to get them moving with the music, before you try to lead anything more difficult.

(In answer to your question, my guess is that the ladies are moving early.)
Re: Lead and follow
Posted by terence2
9/12/2009  11:51:00 PM
The person who moves 1st, is AHEAD of the music ????????... hopefully, the 2 will move as ONE..
Re: Lead and follow
Posted by Cyd
9/24/2009  2:41:00 PM
I doubt whether it is possible for two people dancing to move as one on all steps. If we take any move where one or the other has further to go. Step four to five of a Natural Spin Turn is one that comes to mind. To move as one we would have to do exactly the same step at exactly the same time which is not possible because one os going forward and the other backwards . One is moving out of the other ones way aren't we.... To create an appearance of moving as one is only an illusion.
Re: Lead and follow
Posted by Three Wise Men
9/26/2009  4:32:00 PM
Telemark. As Terence quoted Richard Gleave the first thing that moves is the knee. Which is absolutely correct.
But analyze this.
This is for a normal walk with a heel lead. For instance the first step of a Feather Step or a Natural Turn in the Waltz
1. Do you bend your front knee before the full extent of the stride.
2. Do you bend your front knee whilst your rear foot is still to the rear.
3. Do you bend your front knee only as the rear foot reaches the standing foot under the body.
Re: Lead and follow
Posted by richhicks
9/29/2009  6:58:00 AM
Actually you have it wrong. In waltz you want a swing action in the legs. first weight is lowered, next your leg moves in a swing action... her leg moves to make room for you, then your body weight follows. If you move your weight first then your feet you will run her over. try it
Re: Lead and follow
Posted by anymouse
9/29/2009  10:10:00 AM
"Actually you have it wrong. In waltz you want a swing action in the legs. first weight is lowered, next your leg moves in a swing action... her leg moves to make room for you, then your body weight follows. If you move your weight first then your feet you will run her over. try it"

No. The primary swing action is in the body, not in the legs. The body is in continued horizontal motion from the peak of rise of one measure down and back up to the peak of rise of the next, but the legs have to stop and start since you keep changing which foot is moving.

The only time the body stops traveling during swing-type movements is at the peak of rise. In something like foxtrot the peak of rise is lower and does not completely absorb the travel, so the body slows but does not stop on top.

Re: Lead and follow
Posted by richhicks
9/29/2009  1:08:00 PM
That makes sence
Thank you
Re: Lead and follow
Posted by Three Wise Men
9/29/2009  5:27:00 PM
Anonymous. After getting it clear in your head what you personaly are trying to do . It might be a good idea if you then go to any of the demonstrations on youtube and see without any pre-conceived ideas exactly how it is done. If as you try to say the body moves first. Is this a forward movement, or is the body being lowered by the knees, which is a downward movement not a horizontal movement which then has the knees ahead of the rest of the body as Richard Gleave says, and pointed out by Terence. If you were to move your body forward first, how do you propose to bend your standing knee to an angle of 45 degrees. It is a fact that if I move my weight forward first I will find it almost impossible to bend my standing leg without my body pitching forrward. Some person might say that we are already lowered before we start.
Thats correct. And your knee will be the furthest part of you that is forward.
If you had Dance Vision 4 by Richard Gleave on a Natural Turn he calls the first step, Turn combined with Swing. Then Sway on beat three. He makes a point of saying that to Swing only on the first step is not enough. CBM will be missing.
Re: Lead and follow
Posted by anymouse
9/30/2009  7:54:00 AM
"Is this a forward movement, or is the body being lowered by the knees, which is a downward movement not a horizontal movement"

Lowering is both a downward movement and a horizontal movement that occurs at the same time. When lowering from foot closure a beginner might be excused for not knowing about the horizontal part as it starts out small and only becomes large towards the completion of the lowering, but an advanced dancer must have this in their awareness. And the horizontal component should be obvious to everyone when lowering with the feet apart.

"If you were to move your body forward first, how do you propose to bend your standing knee to an angle of 45 degrees."

I would not, as doing so is pointedly absurd. An angle of 45 degrees in the knee would give you the appearance of someone trying to sit on his heels and do cossack kicks. I rather suspect you meant to write about something else, such as the angle of the shin relative to the floor? (though that would only reach 45 degrees in championship scale movement)

"It is a fact that if I move my weight forward first I will find it almost impossible to bend my standing leg without my body pitching forrward."

Only because you personally have not yet learned how to manage the trajectory of your body weight, and how to decouple that from your posture so that you can remain upright.

That you seem to want to be bending your standing leg at a point in time when you should be straightening it from its bent position doesn't help matters either.
Re: Lead and follow
Posted by Three Wise Men
10/1/2009  1:49:00 AM
Anonymous. I can see by your paragraph four that you have no idea how to bend your knees without sticking your rear out. With the 45 degree angle from the thigh to the knee will mean that there is also the same angle between the knee to the foot. If at this point you were on your toes you would also have that same angle between your toes to your heel. If anybody asks I can explain how to make a model from a strip of paper that shows exactly how the legs and feet are able to make these angles without their backside protuding. Bottom out, would be a sitting position wouldn't it. Very much like a Cossack Dancer.

+ View More Messages

Copyright  ©  1997-2026 BallroomDancers.com