"Side & brush" wouldn't do for me, I'm afraid. The man's pull action is really backwards - after all this is a heel turn in which the feet don't close. The width of the part-close varies widely too: the widest would be the QS Natural Turn with Hesitation, and the other QS use, the Natural Turn at a Corner very nearly closes altogether. The next step there is LF fwd (so no possibility of a brush), and it is interesting to observe the absence of undivided turn for lady, linked to the impetus of the man's action in his turning step being reduced by the width of his 'almost close'.
The figure is usually badly danced, with the wrong weight distribution between the feet, and in particular, the absence of correct pressure using the heel of RH when 'scribing' the heel in an arc back from its previous forward position to end to the side.