Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad

+ View Older Messages

Re: Constant flow in the Slow Foxtrot
Posted by suomynona
2/20/2006  6:29:00 PM
"The push is off the back foot, and the front foot is some 7 to 10 inches in front of the body being propelled by the supporting foot."

I'd be very happy with 7-10 inches in front of the body, as that's at least 12 inches less than what many commonly over-reach to. (If my toes is 7 inches ahead of my body, my ankle is directly under my hip)

"For the ladies. As we all know the heel of the supporting foot only lowers to the floor as the moving foot arrives under the body."

This is not always true. There are many steps, such as lowering ones, when it is desireable to have the heel lower while the feet are still apart. The common problem of lowering the heel too early is actually on a commence to rise step, such as a step one action, where they lady (or whoever is going backwards) can fall back onto their heel (and fall away from their partner) at a time when they should be pacing their arrival and commencing to rise.

The lowering of the heel needs to be paced and controlled to match the arrival of the forward moving partner. However that does not mean it should not lower until the feet pass - in many cases, lowering it earlier is necessary.
Re: Constant flow in the Slow Foxtrot
Posted by Sandra
2/19/2006  5:58:00 PM
Hi Dave, I have searched discussion pages and learning centre looking for
the "step,swing,drift principle" (foxtrot) you mention. Where may I find this? Also I read the discussions on curving figures. I have just started a Silver Star Waltz pattern which commences with an overturned spin turn, curving lock, impetus turn, weave. Any comments on the curving figure in this sequence in relation to timing and additionally body position? So far I have noted the "turning of the shoulders, then hips when changing direction from curve to impetus?
Re: Constant flow in the Slow Foxtrot
Posted by Anonymous
2/20/2006  4:41:00 AM
what does this have to do with dave's foxtrot question??????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Re: Constant flow in the Slow Foxtrot
Posted by Skip
2/20/2006  11:14:00 AM
Sandra .Please post your message again as a new subject so that we can reply
Clarify previous steps mentioned
Posted by Sandra
2/19/2006  6:06:00 PM
Hi Dave, I don't want to confuse anyone or myself. I think the steps I described in my earlier message should be described as Natural Spin Turn overturned / Turning Lock to R / Weave from PP.
Re: Constant flow in the Slow Foxtrot
Posted by Onlooker
2/20/2006  5:41:00 AM
Dave. If you are interested to what is being currently taught in the Foxtrot. The length of the mans and ladies steps do differ. A Feather Step Reverse Turn Three step. I'll stop there. For the man Preperation Step small, then, big, small, small. First of Reverse small small, small, followed by big, small, small, then big, big, small. The Lady there is a difference, she has small, big, small, small, big, small, small, big, small, small, big, big, small. If anyone thinks that all the steps by man or lady are the same size. Try to do a Open Impetus into a Promenade movement both taking the same size steps. The man will not get around. As John Wood says the man will get around though by using his sturdy left arm, but that's not good technique.
Re: Constant flow in the Slow Foxtrot
Posted by phil.samways
2/20/2006  5:54:00 AM
So where does this all leave us. THere have been many sensible comments to this discussion. I'm attracted to the concept of smooth, continuous flow, letting the legs take care of themselves - this after all is what tennis players and the like do when moving to the ball - the body has to be right.
But the dsifficulty is that the lady has very different leg movements from the man, so somebody has to compromise.
Also, take a fallaway reverse turn in slow foxtrot. Isn't the 'official' timing S, &, Q, Q leaving only half a beat to complete a tricky movement. Maybe the fallaway can't have continuous flow. it's certainly easier to dance it as all quicks, but this looks (and feels) different
Re: Constant flow in the Slow Foxtrot
Posted by Dave
2/20/2006  11:00:00 AM
Phil,the FSP in the foxtrot "S&,Q,Q."is four quicks, You move into the fallaway with more body speed than you would a reverse turn I believe.
Re: Constant flow in the Slow Foxtrot
Posted by Don
2/21/2006  8:49:00 PM
Phil. What I have noticed in the Waltz is that the timing being used by some is 1 2 3 & The Slip Pivot on & after the Fallaway. The idea being that with the syncopation in a different placed makes the whole thing look less rushed.
I think this can also be used in the Foxtrot over the Four beats.
Re: Constant flow in the Slow Foxtrot
Posted by Dave
2/20/2006  5:58:00 AM
Thank You Suomy. Onlooker I think you should read and impliment Suomy advice. Thinking of the size of ones steps is not something I would recommend even to a begginer. The body flight controls the size of the steps, not the reverse.The size of the Lady's steps are determined by the man's flight. I don't want to be rude,but perhaps you should go to a different studio. Dave

+ View More Messages

Copyright  ©  1997-2026 BallroomDancers.com