Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad

+ View Older Messages

Re: second step in waltz
Posted by anymouse
7/8/2008  7:24:00 PM
"Anonymous. So now we come to the big question. If you were taking a teaching examination and was asked to explain , you would be wrong according to the technique book which you would be working from. Isn't that so."

If you are being examined in the context of the technique book, give answers in the context of the technique book.

These answers are not incorrect if stated in the way they are written in the book, they are merely incomplete. But the goal of the technique book and related examination is to present some of the key ideas in a consistent manner. It was never about explaining everything. With your actual students you would have time to do that as necessary.
Copyright  ©  1997-2026 BallroomDancers.com