/* I can see that if the step is Back Weighted the hip action might become less fluid. This then will also apply to the man's Back Basic. Who in there right mind would send their weight over the back in a Backward Walk anyway, checked or not.*/
Hi to All,
Back weighted. This was just an example exercise, during the lecture, to show that if the body was held in such a poise (WHICH IT IS NOT! excuse the shouting) then a Checked Backward Walk (CBW) would become necessary. The original query was, 'Why is there not a CBW when stepping back, as the counter-part to a Checked Forward Walk (CFW)?' The answer is because the weight of the body is FORWARD! and it is not required. (Remember: There is no such step called a Checked Backward Walk) But, if the weight of the body poise was back ... Regarding the New York. Both gent and lady have the correct forward poise so it's necessary to dance a CFW. The Spot Turns. Today's technique in the ISTD and the UKA Latin books(not Laird)describe two methods of dancing a Spot Turn. The first and most popular way of dancing this figure, is to keep one foot in place whilst making the turn on step one. This method requires a Forward Walk Turning on step one. The second method, over the first two steps,is to dance two forward walks turning strongly to the right or left. Of course, this method of turning does not require keeping the other foot in place. Now whether you personally dislike the second method, or not, it can be danced and it would be required for a candidate in a professional examination to be fully conversant with this method for a qualification in the ISTD or the UKAPTD.