Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad

+ View Older Messages

Re: If No Arthur Murray, Then Where?
Posted by 5lisamarie
8/27/2007  7:07:00 AM
dance4joy..........applause, applause..........WELL SAID!!!!!
Re: If No Arthur Murray, Then Where?
Posted by Guest1
8/27/2007  11:50:00 AM
Danz4joy, I understand you're angry of the negative publicity, but we're merely stating our experiences at AM/FADs. We were once naive, but we got burned and learned and we want to educate new people on how to choose wisely. If you are not getting businesses, change or go work for an independent. If you are truely good at what you do, you wouldn't have any problems getting business, right?
Re: If No Arthur Murray, Then Where?
Posted by anymouse
8/27/2007  2:42:00 PM
"If you are truely good at what you do, you wouldn't have any problems getting business, right?"

More like, if you are truly good at doing something for which there is a market.
Re: If No Arthur Murray, Then Where?
Posted by rhythm4ever
8/27/2007  3:20:00 PM
Guest1,
It would be more accurate then to simply say, "here is the expierience that I had at this particular AM or FADS" rather than saying "they all stink" don't you think? This way you are not making statements about some other 400 studios that you have never been to or know nothing about. This way good hard working studios aren't getting the "credit" that the other less than stellar studios have earned.
Re: If No Arthur Murray, Then Where?
Posted by Guest1
8/27/2007  4:26:00 PM
I'm all for specific location, but I don't think the host of this site will allow it. If we're allowed that, you'll see that it's all over the place and not just isolated to one specific region. This issue is wide spread because they have the same business model. The so called "good studios" that Danz4joy and a few other are defending for their lives are very rare.
Re: If No Arthur Murray, Then Where?
Posted by hp
8/27/2007  11:29:00 PM
The chain studios are in the special position that they could provide unqualified teachers to serious dance students who are capable of and are desirous of learning really good ballroom dancing. Their unqualified teachers would find no business as independents, or at least no serious student would go to them and stay. In such instances, the chain studios would be using their blend names to offer inferior service, tantamount to consumer fraud. The student may not find out, given the self enclosed nature of many of these chain studios, until much harm has been done. I see that happens personally.

To be an ethical business, the chain studios should retain and assign qualified teachers for such students. I confess I don't know to what extent that is happening.
Re: If No Arthur Murray, Then Where?
Posted by boleros2aerosmith
8/30/2007  4:09:00 PM
Amen!, Danz4joy. Amen.
Re: If No Arthur Murray, Then Where?
Posted by Serendipidy
8/30/2007  10:16:00 PM
Many like myself have never come in contact with an AM Studio. I know what a franchise is. What I'm wondering , are the franchisee answerable to anyone. Do they please themselves to what standard they teach, or what the standard is of their staff. Here , to teach in a studio one must have done a Level O course and past an examination. Even then to take a class or an idividual lesson, a Level O must have a fully qualified teacher in the studio at that time. If they were a competitor and broke the rules they would be in big trouble along with the studio owner. Sometimes the people in control do go a bit too far. A while ago one of our top amateurs was asked to judge a Rock and Roll event, which isn't even ballroom. It was only a small fun thing at a local club. He was brought before the board and they tried to slap a ban on him. He immediatelly turned professional which took him out of their control. He later won the Professional title.
Re: If No Arthur Murray, Then Where?
Posted by rbdance
5/9/2008  7:57:00 PM
Hey there. I know this thread is a bit old now, but I live in the same area as you, and take down at Dancer Avenue in Lomita. All the teachers originated from either AM or Fred Astaire, so they are well-trained, but better priced and much more flexible (less cult-like).

They are on Narbonne, sometimes still found under 'Stardance Studio' as well. Also, there is the Regency Ballroom in Lomita, just a short drive away from Dancer Ave.

I hope that helps, and hope to see you there!
Re: If No Arthur Murray, Then Where?
Posted by Days&Nights
6/1/2008  7:50:00 PM
Try WalkInDanceOut in Redondo Beach.
They have a web site. Redondo Beach is not that far from Hawthorne.
Also, the Hacienda in El Segundo (down the street literally from Hawthorne)offers group classes via qualified instructors. They normally have a great group of people that come as well as WalkInDanceOut. Many of them know of studios closer to you. If you can drive to Torrance/Lomita there is another studio as well.
Copyright  ©  1997-2026 BallroomDancers.com