Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad

+ View Older Messages

Re: Laird's Suggested Amalgamations
Posted by SocialDancer
6/14/2007  2:58:00 AM
Could anyone with an older edition than mine (2003) say whether these amalgamations have always been named after "Grades",


My 1988 edition also refers to Grades and I suspect that came from the original back in 1961.

AFAIK other branches of dance such as ballet, stage and tap use the term for their class descriptions and examinations.
Each dance organisation makes its own choice of which figures are included in which level, and how that level is described both for medal tests and for competitions, so the earlier advice to look at the figures is the best way to go.

Different levels are described in different ways for;

Teacher qualifications: Associate, Member/Licentiate, Fellow.
Medallists: Bronze, Silver, Gold, Gold Stars/Bars.
Classes: Beginners, Improvers, Hobbyist etc

Societies originally found it simple to base Bronze medals on the Associate syllabus etc but changes and developments have meant that the two do not now always align completely.
Copyright  ©  1997-2026 BallroomDancers.com