Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad

+ View Older Messages

Re: Samba
Posted by Serendipidy
4/25/2008  2:53:00 PM
SocialDancer. Reading that book will drive a person insane. Especially when we get to the part where the timing is given under Samba Boubce Action page 52 as &1&a2&1&a2...etc and yet not mentioned in the descriptions. I'm sure there are many adjudicators out there who don't know what they are looking at either.
To start another argument. To have a count of (a) in front of a movement is Technicaly and mathematicaly not correct. The (a) comes from the beat that is now in the past and cannot be part of the future. It has a new beginning . But we will continue to do so anyway won't we.
Copyright  ©  1997-2026 BallroomDancers.com